Can ChatGPT Replace Teachers?
In the several months that ChatGPT has been active, there has been a lot of talk among educators as to whether or not the platform poses a threat to the livelihood of teachers everywhere. With growing numbers of cocky students now believing that they needn’t listen to teachers as they claim to be able to ask ChatGPT anything they need, it’s understandable why some educators would think this way.
ChatGPT or AI will not replace teachers. While AI technologies can assist in certain tasks, teachers possess essential qualities like human connection, personalized instruction, critical thinking development, social-emotional learning, practical application, adaptability, and ethical guidance that AI lacks.
We look further into whether ChatGPT really present this kind of existential threat? Could it really be the thing that finally replaces teachers?
We’ll be exploring these questions and more in today’s article.

Can ChatGPT Replace Teachers?
The short answer is no. Despite the great amount of bluster that is shared about the capabilities and potential of ChatGPT, it can’t replace teachers — not yet, at least. Right now, ChatGPT is essentially a new and evolved form of the encyclopedia.
Admittedly, it’s a huge advancement on platforms such as Wikipedia where readers have to search and read through large volumes of content manually to get what they need. However, this is a close approximation of its current form, and is thus nowhere near as capable as a human teacher.
The main issue that education authorities point to is that ChatGPT works by essentially compiling grammatically accurate content based on its predictions on what should come next, and what is connected to the initial prompt.
It is unable to think anywhere near as deeply as a human teacher can, nor can it properly grasp nuance or context. These are things that we need teachers to show us.
Why is ChatGPT Not Yet a Threat to Teachers?
Whether it can replace teachers or not, some educators still perceive ChatGPT as a threat and thus are quite hostile towards it, and hostile to the idea of their students using it in their studies.
The fact is that ChatGPT really poses no threat at all to teachers. In fact, it can be quite a good ally in the modern classroom.
Accuracy of Information
Many have already pointed out that ChatGPT is far from perfect when it comes to generating accurate and meaningful information. Actually, it has been shown many times already that content generated by ChatGPT for educational circles is prone to all kinds of errors.
The clue to this can actually be found in the platform’s name “ChatGPT.” The ‘GPT’ part stands for ‘generative pre-trained transformer’, which indicates that the tool is for generating grammatically sound bodies of text based on what it has already been taught, rather than any kind of original ideas or carefully nuanced thought.
This reinforces our previously mentioned idea that ChatGPT in its current form is really just an evolved version of an encyclopedia. It is truly amazing in its own way, but it is far from a teacher substitute.
The reality is that if ChatGPT could replace teachers now, then so could Wikipedia. At least Wikipedia has an army of volunteer fact checkers and correctors to keep its content accurate, not to mention exhaustive references.

Tools to Prevent Cheating
Almost as soon as the potential for using ChatGPT for academic cheating was seen, companies set to work to try and counter it. Just as the practice of purchasing essays online or plagiarizing content for academic purposes were both detected and shut down, so too can we find those who try to use ChatGPT for such ends.
One such example is Google Docs, which contains a feature that allows users to analyze patterns and statistics in a text to guess with some accuracy whether it was written organically or AI generated.
Other platforms such as gltr.io also help, GLTR stands for Giant Language Model Test Room. This tool uses the same principles that ChatGPT uses to generate text, but as a way to detect generated content.
It uses its pre-programmed understanding of human-written content, AI-generated content and the differences to guess with accuracy whether or not words in a text were written or generated.
An Ally in the Classroom
Beyond its own limitations and the software available to detect wrongdoing, ChatGPT can actually be an invaluable tool in the teacher’s toolbox.
For instance, teachers can use the tool themselves to get writing prompts, lesson plan ideas, or to generate age- or level-appropriate reading content.
Being able to instantly generate reading content tailored to a single student would be an incredibly empowering thing for an educator with mixed-ability students in their classroom. It can make educational differentiation a reachable reality.
Teachers can also encourage students to use ChatGPT to generate content that is then used as a starting point in lessons.
Students can take raw AI-generated content and study it more closely to see for themselves the limitations of their new tool. They can also reflect on how to make the content better, how to add more depth to the analysis, and more.
One more area that teachers have explored the effectiveness of ChatGPT is for grading student assignments.
Most current educational software can help teachers quickly mark any tests, quizzes and assignments that have fixed answers, but it’s unable to effectively mark essay questions, other than perhaps checking for spelling and grammar issues. ChatGPT, on the other hand, could use more intricate standards to analyze the quality of student content.
Some have strongly objected to such use, however, claiming that it will simply be used to reinforce problematic biases that are holding some students back. Whether or not this can be ironed out through proper study and regulation remains to be seen.

Will ChatGPT Be Able to Replace Teachers in Future?
This is a tough question to answer because right now it’s impossible for us to see how fast or how far the technology can advance. Right now it’s a much more advanced form of encyclopedia that helps us find and generate the information we want much faster and more precisely.
It can also be used by teachers to generate useful reading content, exercises, and other content to suit a topic or grade level.
However, the fundamental and most critical qualities of teachers cannot be emulated by ChatGPT or any other current AI. This software cannot show empathy or sympathy, nor can it offer nuanced and layered insight into the complexities of educational content.
ChatGPT doesn’t really know what it’s talking about when it generates content. It merely reacts to our own input and tries to generate what it believes that we need. That’s not anything like on the level of any teacher working anywhere in the world today. We sum up some of these differences in the table below and then explore them in more detail in the sections following.
Why teachers are Still Vital in the Classroom
we will start with a summary of the points as we go into a fair bit of detail on these!
Key Aspects | Teachers | ChatGPT |
---|---|---|
Human Connection | Establish emotional bonds, provide support, and create a positive classroom environment. | Lacks the ability to establish meaningful human connections and offer emotional support. |
Individualized Instruction | Cater to diverse learning styles, adapt content, and provide tailored guidance to each student. | Limited capacity to offer personalized instruction and adapt to individual student needs. |
Critical Thinking | Promote critical thinking skills, encourage analysis, and facilitate problem-solving through interactive discussions and activities. | Unable to foster critical thinking skills or provide nuanced insights into complex problems. |
Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) | Foster social and emotional development, empathy, and conflict resolution skills. | Lacks the capacity to teach social and emotional skills or provide guidance in personal growth. |
Practical Application | Bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and real-world application through hands-on activities and examples. | Limited in providing practical applications and real-world context for learning. |
Adaptability and Flexibility | Adjust teaching methods based on students’ needs, pace, and progress. | Less adaptable to individual student requirements and learning pace. |
Ethical Considerations | Address ethical implications, biases, and ensure fairness and inclusivity in education. | Prone to biases and limitations in AI-generated content, requiring human oversight and regulation. |
Future Collaboration | Potential for collaboration between teachers and AI technologies to enhance education. | Can be used as a tool to support and complement teaching but cannot replace the expertise and role of teachers. |
Parental Involvement | Engage and involve parents in their child’s education, provide guidance and support. | Lacks the ability to provide parental involvement and guidance necessary for holistic education. |
Professional Development | Continuously update knowledge, adopt best practices, and engage in ongoing learning. | Does not require continuous professional development or adaptability to changing educational practices. |
The Importance of Human Connection:
Teachers play a vital role in establishing strong human connections with their students. Beyond being a source of knowledge, they provide emotional support, guidance, and understanding. Teachers create a safe and nurturing classroom environment where students feel valued and respected.
Through these connections, teachers can effectively motivate students, address their individual needs, and foster a positive learning atmosphere. They can detect and respond to students’ emotional well-being, helping them navigate challenges and develop essential life skills.
The personal bond formed between teachers and students enhances the learning experience, promotes engagement, and creates a sense of belonging that no AI can replicate.

Individualized Instruction and Personalized Learning:
One of the greatest strengths of teachers is their ability to deliver individualized instruction. They understand that students have diverse learning styles, strengths, and weaknesses. Teachers adapt their teaching methods, content, and assessments to cater to each student’s unique needs.
They can provide additional support to struggling students, challenge advanced learners, and modify instructional strategies to ensure comprehension and growth for all. Through ongoing assessment and feedback, teachers monitor student progress and make necessary adjustments. This personalized approach nurtures student confidence, promotes deeper understanding, and encourages a love for learning.
While AI tools like ChatGPT can offer information, they lack the nuanced understanding of individual student needs and the ability to provide tailored guidance that teachers provide.
Critical Thinking and Problem-Solving Skills:
Teachers are instrumental in developing critical thinking and problem-solving skills in students. They create opportunities for students to analyze, question, and evaluate information critically. Through interactive discussions, projects, and real-life scenarios, teachers challenge students to think beyond surface-level knowledge and develop analytical thought processes.
Teachers guide students in developing logical reasoning, creativity, and the ability to formulate and articulate their thoughts effectively. They facilitate collaboration and stimulate higher-order thinking through open-ended questions and thought-provoking activities.
In contrast, ChatGPT’s capabilities are limited to generating information based on existing data and predictions. It lacks the capacity to engage students in meaningful dialogue, challenge their assumptions, or foster the deeper understanding required for effective critical thinking and problem-solving.
Social and Emotional Learning (SEL):
Teachers play a crucial role in fostering social and emotional learning in students. They create a supportive and inclusive classroom environment where students can develop empathy, emotional intelligence, and positive relationships.
Teachers provide guidance in navigating conflicts, practicing active listening, and developing communication skills. They teach important life skills such as self-awareness, self-regulation, and responsible decision-making.
Through modeling and mentoring, teachers help students develop resilience, perseverance, and a sense of community.
AI tools like ChatGPT lack the ability to address the social and emotional aspects of education and cannot provide the personalized support and guidance that teachers offer.

Practical Application and Real-World Context:
Teachers excel in bridging the gap between theoretical knowledge and practical application. They bring real-world examples, hands-on activities, and experiential learning opportunities to the classroom.
Teachers connect concepts to real-life contexts, helping students understand how knowledge applies to the world around them. They facilitate discussions, encourage critical analysis of real-world issues, and guide students in applying their learning to solve practical problems.
In contrast, ChatGPT primarily generates text-based information and lacks the ability to provide concrete, tangible experiences that enhance students’ understanding and application of knowledge.
Adaptability and Flexibility:
Teachers possess the remarkable ability to adapt their teaching methods to meet the diverse needs of their students. They recognize that different students learn at different paces and have unique learning preferences.
Teachers adjust their instruction, pacing, and content delivery to accommodate individual student requirements. They modify their approaches based on ongoing assessments, student feedback, and changing circumstances.
Teachers also address various learning styles and incorporate different instructional strategies to engage students effectively. In contrast, ChatGPT has limited adaptability and cannot provide the same level of personalized instruction or respond dynamically to individual student needs.
The flexibility and adaptability of teachers make them essential in meeting the ever-changing demands of education and supporting student success.
Ethical Considerations and Bias:
Teachers play a critical role in addressing ethical considerations and promoting fairness in education. They guide students in understanding and critically analyzing information sources, including potential biases and misinformation.
Teachers foster a sense of inclusivity, respect for diversity, and the ability to challenge assumptions and stereotypes. They navigate sensitive topics, encourage open dialogue, and ensure that multiple perspectives are considered.
ChatGPT’s content generation is based on pre-existing data, which can introduce biases and limitations. Human oversight and regulation are necessary to address potential biases and ensure that educational content is fair, accurate, and promotes unbiased learning.

The Future of Education:
The future of education lies in the collaboration between teachers and AI technologies. While AI tools like ChatGPT can be valuable resources, they cannot replace the expertise and role of teachers. Teachers possess the knowledge, experience, and interpersonal skills necessary to facilitate effective learning experiences.
AI can support teachers by providing instant access to information, assisting with administrative tasks, and offering supplementary resources. The combination of human expertise and AI tools can enhance educational outcomes, promote innovative teaching methods, and support personalized learning.
It is through this collaborative approach that the future of education can harness the benefits of technology while preserving the essential human elements that teachers bring to the classroom.
Parental Involvement and Support:
Teachers collaborate with parents to create a strong educational support system. They communicate with parents, providing updates on student progress, addressing concerns, and involving them in their child’s learning journey.
Teachers work closely with parents to develop strategies for academic and behavioral support, fostering a partnership that promotes student success. ChatGPT lacks the ability to involve parents or provide the necessary parental guidance and support that is crucial for holistic education.
Professional Development and Continuous Learning:
Teachers engage in continuous professional development to stay updated with the latest research, pedagogical practices, and technological advancements. They attend workshops, conferences, and training sessions to refine their teaching skills and enhance their knowledge.
Teachers actively seek opportunities to improve their instructional strategies, incorporate innovative teaching methods, and adapt to the evolving needs of students. In contrast, ChatGPT does not require continuous professional development or possess the adaptability needed to keep pace with changing educational practices.
Teachers’ commitment to ongoing learning ensures that they remain effective educators and provide the best possible education for their students.
Further ChatGpt in Education links
- How to use ChatGPT in an English Classroom
- 100 ChatGPT prompts for English Teachers
- 19 ways to use ChatGPT in a Classroom
- Ethics and ChatGPT in Education
- Chat GPT as a Learning Companion
- The future of AI in Education
- Can ChatGPT replace teachers
Conclusion,
while ChatGPT and other AI technologies have shown great advancements in generating information and assisting in certain aspects of education, they cannot replace the role of teachers.
Teachers bring essential qualities that AI lacks, such as the ability to establish meaningful human connections, provide personalized instruction, foster critical thinking skills, and promote social and emotional learning.
Teachers excel in bridging the gap between theory and practical application, adapting their teaching methods to meet diverse student needs, addressing ethical considerations, and involving parents in the education process.
Collaboration between teachers and AI can enhance education, but the fundamental and irreplaceable qualities of teachers make them indispensable in providing holistic and effective learning experiences for students.
References
- https://www.nst.com.my/opinion/columnists/2023/05/905996/chatgpt-cannot-replace-teachers
- https://www.forbes.com/sites/rayravaglia/2023/03/31/chatgpt-will-not-replace-teachers-but-could-act-as-a-teaching-assistant/?sh=32eff476cad2
- https://www.gizchina.com/2023/04/26/bill-gates-chatgpt-will-soon-be-able-to-replace-teachers/
- https://nilotp.medium.com/will-chatgpt-replace-teachers-1201b68d8010
- https://www.schoolrubric.org/chatgpt-wont-replace-high-school-teachers-anytime-soon-heres-why/
- https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/491085/chatgpt-might-doom-us-all-but-it-won-t-replace-teachers-expert
You must log in to post a comment.